Episode 2 of True
Detective is
appropriately titled “Seeing Things”; while Rust hallucinates visually, Marty
suffers from ideological delusions about women due to his attachment to the
paradigmatic nuclear family. This becomes clear both during and after the
men’s interview with Dora’s mother, Mrs. Kelly, at the beginning of the
episode. Disconcerted by Mrs. Kelly’s migraine attack and ruined fingernails,
Marty describes her as a “piece of work.” Mrs. Kelly, who “worked in dry
cleaning for 20 years” as a single mother to support her daughter, is the
complete opposite of Marty’s “Donna Reed type” mother. Marty fondly
recalls how his mother “packed lunches” and “[read] bedtime stories” as the
quintessential mid-century housewife. In idealizing this cultural lie
about the nuclear family, Marty also idealizes women who passively submit to
men. In other words, Marty can only accept the virginal woman within the
virgin/whore dichotomy.
So, who is a virgin and who is whore
on True
Detective?
Although not biologically “virgins,” the virginal women on the show rarely (if
ever) appear outside of a Donna Reed- or June Cleaver-approved domestic
setting, like the kitchen or the living room. On the other hand, the
“whores”—who are literally prostitutes—appear in public places, such as truck
stops and bars. Perhaps the only exception to this rule within this
episode is the Kathleen, Marty’s “little vixen” secretary responsible for
little more than making coffee. Her unquestionably subordinate role in
the office is in this way acceptable within the sphere of masculinity, and she
can remain a “virgin.” And, although Mrs. Kelly admits to working outside
the home in the past, she appears in her living room during the episode.
Additionally, her fingernails--a classic symbol of femininity--were destroyed
due to her work. Is this her punishment for transgressing against the
nuclear family by becoming her own breadwinner?
The episode shifts from the world of
the virgins to the realm of the whores when Marty and Rust follow the trail of
clues to “The Ranch.” Here, we begin to learn the true extent of Marty’s
delusional ideas about female sexuality. He assumes that the young
prostitute, a friend of the late Dora, is underage, and perhaps she is; the
madam neither confirms nor denies Marty’s accusation. However, it is
clear that something besides the suspect legality of the young girl’s
employment motivates his anger. As the madam remarks, women “[screw] for
free” all the time, but men are only threatened when women mix “business” in
with sex. While the “virgins” in this episode occupy an approved
submissive relationship with men, the “whores” use their sexuality to exploit
men financially. In other words, female sexuality is permitted provided
that men can “own,” or control, it.
Marty’s relationship with his mistress, Lisa, is a particularly shocking
example of masculine attempt to own female sexuality. Lisa cannot be
anything other than Marty’s sex object, and he even rebukes her for going out
with her friends (or having a life of her own). In an attempt to convince
Lisa to stay home, away from the bars where she could “keep her options open”
and perhaps “meet a nice man,” thus rejecting her role as his sex object, Marty
warns her that a murderer is on the loose. Although this could be
interpreted as concern for Lisa, she does not live a high-risk lifestyle, and
so it is unlikely that she will become the murderer’s next victim. As
Rust remarks earlier in the episode, “[Dora] was just an easy target” for the
killer as a drug addict and prostitute. So, Marty’s seemingly innocuous
remark becomes a threat to his “virginal” mistress that, if she continues to
rebel against his wishes, she will become nothing more than a “whore.”
While this episode focuses mainly on Marty’s treatment of women, it is
seemingly unclear whether the other male characters share his views.
Rust, unlike Marty, appears indifferent to sex; he refuses advances from
prostitutes and never discusses women other than his ex-wife. However,
Rust violently confronts Marty about his affair. What motivates this
confrontation? Is it Rust’s alluded-to attraction to Maggie and his
desire to possess her for himself, or is he truly repulsed by Marty’s behavior
on moral grounds? We need only consider the opening credits of the show to understand that
Marty’s beliefs about women are, in fact, the series’ as well. The images
presented during this minute-and-a-half sequence depict human silhouettes
overlaid with scenic images of rural Louisiana. While the male
silhouettes wear business attire, the female silhouettes are half- or totally
naked. Furthermore, the female silhouettes suffer a voyeuristic
dismemberment which the male silhouettes do not. Viewers might recall the
particularly striking image of a woman crouching in such a way that only her
buttocks and spiked stilettos--which appear to be sadistically digging into her
flesh--are visible. Her dismembered lower half is overlaid with scenery
in such a way that she herself becomes a “frame,” signifying that women in True Detective must be like Donna Reed and
fade, like the scenery, into the background.
Perhaps “The Ranch” presents an alternative to female repression within the
series. The ranch women live in an isolated, matriarchal commune, whose
only contact with men is to exploit them financially as customers. As
soon as we consider the connotations of the word ranch, though, we lose hope
that this any type of “matriarchy” could exist within the series. Just
like cattle, the women of “The Ranch” are simply supplying a market-driven
demand for “meat.” Additionally, the protected communal status the women
enjoy is only possible due to the sheriff, who uses his power within
patriarchal society to permit the male-serving community to illegally
exist. Unfortunately, then, the women of True Detective are finally condemned to submissive secondary roles
behind the men of the police department, virgins and whores alike suffering a
“dismemberment.”
Thanks, Jessica, for this great analysis of gender in the show which I think is really important (and sustained throughout). As the narrative progresses, it will be interesting to trace the explicit dimensions of the gender divide--by which I mean the kind of misogyny and sexual difference that the show clearly sets out to engage--and the more tacit issues that the show taps into more indirectly and in the final analysis may simply fail to work through. Certainly the season finale has been controversial and for some viewers has seemed to fail to meet the bar set by the rest. Having just read Browder's essay on true crime I'm now thinking about the contrast between how gender plays out in that genre as opposed to what True Detective does with the genre (and thus does with the genre's gender dynamics). More discussion for class but also I hope here on the blog!
ReplyDelete